Meta’s Decision To Stop Using Fact-Checkers Attracts Opposition

Meta’s decision to end its fact-checking program and replace it with a community-driven system has sparked backlash, with 71 organizations voicing concerns over the change.

At a Glance

Meta plans to eliminate fact-checkers, adopting a “Community Notes” system.
The change aligns with a shift towards prioritizing free speech on its platforms.
71 organizations oppose the move, concerned about misinformation spread.
Mark Zuckerberg aims to reduce bias in moderation decisions.

Meta Shifts Moderation Approach

Meta’s founder Mark Zuckerberg announced that the company would discontinue using third-party fact-checkers across its platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. Instead, the company plans to implement a system of community-driven moderation, akin to the model employed by Elon Musk’s platform, X. Zuckerberg emphasized that this change is part of an effort to prioritize free speech and reduce perceived bias.

Zuckerberg’s concerns about political bias in fact-checking processes have been a driving factor behind this pivot. He argued that the current system eroded more trust than it built, asserting that the community-driven model promises a wider diversity of perspectives. However, this plan has stirred controversy.

Organizations Voice Concerns

The decision to end the fact-checking program prompted a response from 71 organizations leading to a formal letter to Meta. These organizations expressed concerns that moving away from fact-checking would represent a strategic retreat from ensuring accurate and trustworthy information online. The International Fact-Checking Network, part of the Poynter Institute, criticized the policy as “is a step backward for those who want to see an internet that prioritizes accurate and trustworthy information.”

Meta, however, informed the IFCN about the termination of its partnership shortly before going public with its plans. The shift comes amid broader mobile moderation discussions worldwide, along with questions about the balance of free expression and content control.

Broader Implications and Execution

The move also includes relocating Meta’s content moderation teams from California to Texas to further address perceived bias concerns. In the interior workings of Meta, this change followed Nick Clegg stepping down as President of Global Affairs, succeeded by Joel Kaplan, a Republican, hinting at a political realignment within the company’s structure.

Zuckerberg acknowledged the intricacies of content moderation and the possibility of errors. By eliminating stringent fact-checker oversight, he posits that the community-driven approach will democratize moderation, allowing users to contribute contextual insights. However, critics remain vigilant, noting the potential risks of misinformation and harm if this novel approach fails to deliver the intended outcomes.